Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary LCNEC. We retrospectively reviewed patients with pulmonary LCNEC or possible LCNEC (pLCNEC) who received platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Among these patients, we evaluated the efficacy of second-line treatment by comparing patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC group). Of the 61 patients with LCNEC or pLCNEC (LCNEC group) who received first-line chemotherapy, 39 patients were treated with second-line chemotherapy. Among the 39 patients, 61.5% received amrubicin monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the LCNEC groups were 3.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. No significant differences in the PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.924, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647-1.320; P = 0.664) and OS (HR: 0.926; 95% CI 0.648-1.321; P = 0.670) were observed between the LCNEC and SCLC groups. In patients treated with amrubicin, the PFS (P = 0.964) and OS (P = 0.544) were not different between both the groups. Second-line chemotherapy, including amrubicin, may be considered as a treatment option for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Patient-derived tumoroid models of pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a promising tool for personalized medicine and developing novel therapeutic strategies.

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), a disease with poor prognosis, is classified as pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, along with small-cell lung cancer. However, given its infrequent occurrence, only a limited number of preclinical models have been established. Here, we established three LCNEC tumoroids for long-term culture. Whole-exome sequencing revealed that these tumoroids inherited genetic mutations from their parental tumors; two were classified as small-cell carcinoma (S-LCNEC) and one as non-small cell carcinoma (N-LCNEC). Xenografts from these tumoroids in immunodeficient mice mimicked the pathology of the parent LCNEC, and one reproduced the mixed-tissue types of combined LCNEC with a component of adenocarcinoma. Drug sensitivity tests using these LCNEC tumoroids enabled the evaluation of therapeutic agent efficacy. Based on translational research, we found that a CDK4/6 inhibitor might be effective for N-LCNEC and that Aurora A kinase inhibitors might be suitable for S-LCNEC or LCNEC with MYC amplification. These results highlight the value of preclinical tumoroid models in understanding the pathogenesis of rare cancers and developing treatments. LCNEC showed a high success rate in tumoroid establishment, indicating its potential application in personalized medicine.

Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung and brain metastases - data from a tertiary care center.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is an aggressive malignancy, with brain metastases (BM) occurring in approximately 20% of cases. There are currently no therapy guidelines for this population as only few data on the management of LCNEC and BM have been published. For this retrospective single center study, patients with LCNEC and BM were identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry. Data on clinicopathological features, BM-specific characteristics, treatment, and outcome were extracted. In total, 52/6083 (0.09%) patients in the dataset had a diagnosis of LCNEC and radiologically verified BM. Median age at diagnosis of LCNEC and BM was 59.1 and 60.1 years, respectively. Twenty-seven (51.9%) presented with single BM, while 12 (23%) exhibited > 3 BM initially. Neurologic symptoms due to BM were present in n = 40 (76.9%), encompassing neurologic deficits (n = 24), increased intracranial pressure (n = 18), and seizures (n = 6). Initial treatment of BM was resection (n = 13), whole brain radiation therapy (n = 19), and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 25). Median overall survival (mOS) from LCNEC diagnosis was 16 months, and mOS after BM diagnosis was 7 months. Patients with synchronous BM had reduced mOS from LCNEC diagnosis versus patients with metachronous BM (11 versus 27 months, p = 0.003). Median OS after BM diagnosis did not differ between LCNEC patients and a control group of small cell lung cancer patients with BM (7 versus 6 months, p = 0.17). Patients with LCNEC and BM have a poor prognosis, particularly when synchronous BM are present. Prospective trials are required to define optimal therapeutic algorithms.

Clinical activity of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in advanced pulmonary large-cell and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-based combination strategies have improved the survival outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancers; however, data regarding their efficacy remains limited for uncommon histological types, including large-cell carcinoma (LCC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 60 patients with advanced LCC and LCNEC - 37 treatment-naïve and 23 pre-treated - who received pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy. Treatment and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 37 treatment-naïve patients who received first-line pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy, the 27 patients with LCC had an overall response rate (ORR) of 44.4% (12/27) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 88.9% (24/27); whereas 10 patients with LCNEC had an ORR of 70% (7/10) and DCR of 90% (9/10). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.0 months (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.2-11.8) and median overall survival (mOS) was 24.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-50.1) for first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy of LCC (n = 27), whereas mPFS was 5.5 months (95%CI: 2.3-8.7) and mOS was 13.0 months (95%CI: 11.0-15.0) for first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy of LCNEC (n = 10). Of the 23 pre-treated patients who received subsequent-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy, mPFS was 2.0 months (95% CI: 0.6-3.4) and mOS was 4.5 months (95% CI: 0.0-9.0) for LCC and mPFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 0.0-7.6) and mOS was not reached for LCNEC. CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-world clinical evidence of the anti-tumor activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced LCC and LCNEC, indicating that this regimen could serve as a treatment option, particularly as first-line therapy, for improving the survival outcomes of patients with these rare histological subtypes of lung cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05023837(ESPORTA, 27/08/2021).

Incidence, survival comparison, and novel prognostic evaluation approaches for stage iii-iv pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are two types of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung with poor prognosis. LCNEC has not been thoroughly studied due to its rarity, data are also lacking regarding the survival comparison and prognosis analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic LCNEC and SCLC. METHODS: Data of patients with LCNEC, SCLC, and other NSCLC who were diagnosed from 1975 to 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to estimate incidence. Those in stage III-IV and being diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 were utilized further to investigate their clinical characteristics and prognosis. Propensity score matching (PSM) analyses at a ratio of 1:2 was used to compare their survival outcomes. Nomograms of LCNEC and SCLC were established with internal validation, and the nomogram of SCLC was externally validated by 349 patients diagnosed in Cancer hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. RESULTS: The incidence of LCNEC has been increasing in recent decades, meanwhile that of SCLC and other types of NSCLC were decreasing. A total of 91,635 lung cancer patients, including 785 with LCNEC, 15,776 with SCLC, and 75,074 with other NSCLC were enrolled for further analysis. The survival of stage III-IV LCNEC resembles that of SCLC, and significantly worse than other types of NSCLC before and after PSM analysis. In pretreatment prognostic analysis, age, T stage, N stage, M stage, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, and brain metastasis were found to be associated with the survival of both LCNEC and SCLC, besides sex, bilaterality, and lung metastasis were additional prognostic factors for SCLC. Two nomograms and convenient online tools respectively for LCNEC and SCLC were established accordingly with favorable predicting accuracy of < 1-year, < 2-year, < 3-year survival probabilities. In external validation of the SCLC nomogram with a Chinese cohort, the AUCs of 1-year, 2-year and 3-year ROC were 0.652, 0.669, and 0.750, respectively. All the results of 1-, 2-, 3- year variable-dependent ROC curves verified the superior prognostic value of our nomograms for LCNEC and SCLC over the traditional T/N/M staging system. CONCLUSIONS: Based on large sample-based cohort, we compared the epidemiological trends and survival outcomes between locally advanced or metastatic LCNEC, SCLC, and other NSCLC. Furthermore, two prognostic evaluation approaches respectively for LCNEC and SCLC might present as practical tools for clinicians to predict the survival outcome of these patients and facilitate risk stratification.

[Alectinib and mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.] / Az alectinib és a tüdo kevert nagysejtes neuroendokrin carcinomája.

The treatment of mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is less studied due to its low incidence. However, the presence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene is rare in such tumours, ALK inhibitors may represent a promising therapeutic option instead of cytostatic therapy. Routine chest X-ray and then computed tomography (CT) examination revealed a pulmonary tumour in a 52-year-old asymptomatic woman. The neoplasm was removed by lobectomy. Histological examination confirmed papillary predominant lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was treated with postoperative chemotherapy and irradiation. 3 years later, neurologic symptoms were observed, therefore, brain CT was performed. The evaluation confirmed brain metastases which were removed. Histological examination identified metastasis of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Revision and molecular examination of the metastasis and lung specimen revealed pulmonary mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with ALK-rearrangement. Alectinib (Alecensa) treatment was initiated resulting in regression of the previously observed liver metastases. Progression has not occurred in the last 3 years since the start of treatment. Detection of ALK fusion genes and research of ALK inhibitor therapy focus primarily on lung adenocarcinomas. Our case report would like to draw attention to the evaluation of driver mutations in pulmonary mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma with adenocarcinoma component because targeted treatment may be an effective alternative. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(14): 548-554.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC): a population-based study addressing recent molecular-genetic advances and emerging therapeutic approaches.

BACKGROUND: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare, aggressive cancer most commonly found in the lungs but not exclusively, with a worse prognosis than non-small cell lung carcinomas. Currently, LCNEC patients are treated using small cell and non-small cell protocols. This study aims to use the SEER database to identify demographic, clinical, pathological, and therapeutic factors affecting the prognosis and survival of patients with LCNEC of the lung. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and management data of patients with lung LCNEC were extracted from the SEER database for the period 2000-2018. RESULTS: In the USA, LCNEC has a higher incidence in elderly white men: M:F ratio = 1.2:1, Caucasian: 83.3%, mean age: 67 ± 10.2 years. The most common treatment modality was chemotherapy only: 29.2%, followed by surgery: 21.5% (but in this group the statuses of chemotherapy were unknown), and combination surgery/chemotherapy: 8.8%. The overall and cause-specific 5-year survival was 17.5% (95% CI 16.3-18.8) and 21.9% (95% CI 20.5-23.4), respectively. By treatment, the best 5-year survival was for surgery alone (48%), followed by multimodality therapy (chemo + surgery + radiation) at 35% (95% CI 27-43). Age > 60 years, male gender, size > 7 cm, and nodal and liver metastasis were independent risk factors associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: Lung LCNEC is an aggressive neoplasm most common in older white males that presents at an advanced stage despite small primary tumors. Most patients die within 2 years. The best predictor of survival is surgery with chemotherapy. Given its dismal prognosis, new treatment guidelines are needed for this aggressive cancer.

[A Case of Long-Term Remission with Surgical Therapy and Chemoradiotherapy for a Rapidly Increasing Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma(LCNEC)].

BACKGROUND: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma(LCNEC)is a relatively rare disease classified as a subtype of neuroendocrine tumor. LCNEC has clinical and histological similarities to small cell lung cancer, both of which have a similarly poor prognosis. There are also unclear points regarding treatment. CASE: 43-years-old, male. He had repeated intermittent fever from 1 month before the consultation. Cough appeared 4 days before the consultation, and the family doctor pointed out an abnormal shadow in the right lung field, and the patient was referred. Blood test showed increased CRP 1.34 mg/dL and mild inflammatory response. Chest CT showed an increased tumor with a major axis of 16 cm in the right thoracic cavity compared to 6 months ago. FDG-PET showed accumulation of SUVmax 11.83 in the same area. A CT-guided needle biopsy was performed, and although tumor cell hyperplasia of like a plasma cells was suspected, but most of them were coagulative necrotic images and could not be diagnosed. After hospitalization, fever continued and the general condition became poor, so surgery was performed for the purpose of diagnostic treatment. Preoperatively, Interventional Radiology was used to embolize the tumor-feeding blood vessels. Intrathoracic tumor resection and partial upper and lower lobe resection were performed under thoracotomy. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed that large round to polyhedron tumor cells proliferated in sheet-like or intercellular binding sparsely, and synaptophysin was positive, which was a diagnosis of large cell neuroendocrine cell carcinoma. The general condition improved promptly after the operation, and the patient was discharged 14 days after the operation without any complications. After discharge, 4 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy (CDDP plus CPT-11)were performed. Six months after the operation, the disseminated nodule recurred in the right thoracic cavity. Chemotherapy(CBDCA plus PTX plus BEV)and radiation therapy were performed and the patient was in remission. It has been 5 years since the operation and has not recurred. SUMMARY: We report a case of rapidly increasing LCNEC with long-term remission by surgical treatment and chemoradiotherapy, with some review of the literature.

Effect of Chemotherapy in Stage II-IV Large-Cell Lung Carcinoma and Construction of Its Predictive Nomograms: A SEER Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Large-cell lung carcinoma (LCLC) is generally poorly differentiated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to explore the impact of chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with stage II-IV LCLC and to construct nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: Propensity score matching analysis was used to balance the effects of baseline characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the prognostic impact of chemotherapy on LCLC patients. Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic risk factors, and then nomograms were constructed and validated. RESULTS: Overall, we identified 2,532 patients with LCLC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The chemotherapy group showed better OS and CSS compared to the non-/unknown chemotherapy group for stage II-IV LCLC patients (p < 0.05). Two nomograms were plotted based on the results of Cox regression analysis. The areas under the curves (AUCs) of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.786, 0.824, and 0.837, and the AUCs of CSS were 0.785, 0.821, and 0.836, respectively. The calibration curves showed excellent agreement between the prediction and the actual observation, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated good clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy could improve the prognosis among stage II-IV LCLC patients. In addition, the nomograms showed good predictive ability, which could be useful in making clinical decisions.

Differential response in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung to initial therapy: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Large cell neuroendocrine tumors of the lung (LCNEC) are rare. Chemotherapy with the small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) regimen is the most appropriate treatment for LCNEC. However, there is evidence that the non-small cell lung cancer regimen is also effective in some reported cases. Due to the differences in response to LCNEC treatment, a standard of care for LCNEC has not been established. CASES: The clinical records of nine patients with LCNEC who were treated with anticancer drugs based on an SCLC regimen from March 2016 to March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients who responded to treatment after one cycle of systemic chemotherapy were compared to those who did not respond. All patients in the responder group had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. However, 5 of the 6 patients in the non-responder group had a PS of 2 or 3, indicating that many patients were in poor general condition. Although patients with multiple metastases to more than one organ prior to treatment were not identified in the responder group, five of these patients were in the non-responder group. In the non-responder group, all patients discontinued treatment due to deterioration of general condition during first-line treatment. Thus, none of them were able to start the second-line treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of this study may suggest that early diagnosis and initiation of treatment before multiple organ metastasis development and PS decline may have clinical implications that could lead to improved treatment response in patients with LCNEC.

Treatment outcome and prognostic analysis of advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.

The optimal systemic treatment of advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is still controversial. We intend to explore advanced LCNEC through SEER database, construct nomogram model of advanced LCNEC, and understand the effect of different treatment regimens on LCNEC. We collected 909 patients, divided them into a training set validation set, constructed nomograms using Cox proportional hazards regression models, and evaluated nomogram discrimination and calibration by C-index and calibration curves. Kaplan-Meier will also be used to compare OS in different groups of patients and to explore the impact of different treatment regimens on advanced LCNEC. On the nomogram plotted, the nomogram predicted AUC values over time were always greater than 0.7, the C-index was 0.681 (95% CI 0.656-0.706) and 0.663 (95% CI 0.628-0.698) in the training and validation sets, respectively, and patients were divided into two groups according to risk, and a significant difference in OS was observed between the high-risk and low-risk groups in the training and validation cohorts. Different treatment analyses showed that chemotherapy is still the best treatment for advanced LCNEC. This nomogram provides a convenient and reliable tool for individual assessment and clinical decision-making of patients with advanced LCNEC.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung controlled for 4 years by a single administration of pembrolizumab: A case report.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) is a rare and highly progressive tumor with a poor prognosis. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for treatment of both small cell and non-small cell lung cancers, their role in the treatment of LCNEC is unclear. We describe a patient with postoperative recurrence of LCNEC who maintained complete remission for 4 years after a single administration of pembrolizumab. A 68-year-old Japanese man underwent thoracoscopic right lower lobectomy for LCNEC (pathological stage pT1bN0M0, stage IA2). Epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase were negative, and the programmed death ligand 1 expression rate in tumor cells was 5% (clone 22C3). Eight months later, the patient developed recurrence with mediastinal lymph node metastasis and pleural dissemination. Therefore, chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide was administered. However, relapse occurred 6 months later. Pembrolizumab was administered as second-line chemotherapy, which was discontinued after first dose because of interstitial pneumonia 1 month later. Thereafter, however, both the lymph node metastasis and pleural dissemination disappeared and did not relapse for 4 years. Pembrolizumab may be used as a treatment option for pulmonary LCNEC.

The anticancer effects of cyanidin 3-O-glucoside combined with 5-fluorouracil on lung large-cell carcinoma in nude mice.

The haskap (Lonicera caerulea L., Caprifoliaceae) berry has been widely used in traditional medicine in Kuril Islands, Russia, Japan, and China. Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G) is the most abundant anthocyanin in haskap berries, and C3G induces antiproliferative pharmacological activity in various cancer cells. However, no study has investigated its anti-lung large-cell carcinoma (LCC) pharmacological role. Therefore, this study determined whether C3G alone or C3G combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) inhibits human lung LCC. We determined the tumor growth, apoptosis, inflammation, and metastasis in the H661 lung LCC lines xenografted into BALB/c nude mice. The mice were administered saline (control), 5-FU, C3G, or both C3G and 5-FU. Relative to the control mice, those treated with C3G alone or both C3G and 5-FU exhibited impaired tumor growth; increased tumor apoptosis; decreased inflammatory cytokine levels (e.g., IL-1ß, TNF-α, C-reactive protein, and IL-6); decreased inflammation-related factors, including cyclooxygenase-2 protein and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) mRNA; increased inhibition of NF-κB kinase α mRNA; and downregulated metastasis-related factors, such as transforming growth factor-ß, CD44, epidermal growth factor receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor. In addition, C3G alone or combined with 5-FU affected the expression of the tumor microenvironment-related factors Ki67, CD45, PDL1, and CD73. Compared with the mice treated with 5-FU or C3G alone, those treated with both C3G and 5-FU exhibited significantly impaired tumor growth, decreased tumor sizes, and increased tumor inhibition. This in vivo study demonstrated that C3G alone or combined with 5-FU may impair the growth of lung LCC and inhibit tumorigenesis. The findings indicate that C3G alone or C3G combined with 5-FU may be beneficial for treating human lung LCC.

Platinum Doublet plus Atezolizumab as First-line Treatment in Metastatic Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Single Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung (L-LCNEC) is a rare type of neuroendocrine lung cancer that is increasingly diagnosed. However, the optimal management regarding the advanced stage is unclear. The purpose of this article is to present and compare our experience when L-LCNEC is treated as Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, eight cases of L-LCNEC were included. We retrospectively reviewed medical files and reports by accessing the Institution's Data of patients diagnosed with L-LCNEC from April 2019 until December 2020 and evaluated their response to the combination of Platinum - Etoposide - Atezolizumab as first-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: The overall observed response rate (ORR) of 75%. The median PFS was 6.85 months. The median response duration was 5.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing our findings with other retrospective and prospective studies, it seems that the systematic treatment of choice and management in L-LCNEC of the lung should be that of a small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Complete remission of combined pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), which accounts for approximately 1% of all lung cancers, is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Therefore, it is important to devise an effective treatment strategy. In the treatment of locally advanced complex LCNEC, it is unique to first administer radiotherapy combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel plus carboplatin, followed by durvalumab for immune maintenance treatment after concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy to achieve complete remission. We report a 54-year-old man who smoked and who felt chest tightness for 2 weeks and was diagnosed as having combined pulmonary LCNEC. For patients with locally advanced pulmonary LCNEC, chemoradiotherapy increases overall survival. After surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy, our patient achieved complete remission. Durvalumab was then started to consolidate the treatment. After six courses of immune maintenance therapy, the patient developed grade 2 immune-related pneumonitis and took prednisone orally until the symptoms resolved, and then reached complete remission again. The patient achieved complete remission, which was a challenge with this rare carcinoma, through albumin-bound paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy and durvalumab for immune maintenance therapy. This approach may provide a treatment option for locally advanced combined pulmonary LCNEC.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Programed Death-1 Blockade in Previously Treated Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare tumor with an aggressive clinical course. However, there is limited knowledge of its treatment strategy. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-programed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in previously treated advanced LCNEC. METHODS: Eleven patients with previously treated advanced LCNEC who received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy between January 2015 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Of a total of 11 patients (median [range] age, 66 [37-79] years; 8 men [73%] and 3 women [27%]), 8 patients had performance status (PS) 0-1 [73%] and 3 patients had PS 2 [27%]; 9 patients received 1 prior chemotherapy [82%] and 2 patients received 2 prior chemotherapies [18%]. The median follow-up duration was 4.6 months. Although PD-1 blockade was administered at median cycles of 3 (range, 1-12), overall response rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 9.1%, 2.7 months, and 4.6 months, respectively. Any adverse events were observed in 9 patients (82%), including 1 patient with grade 3 pneumonitis as a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 blockade monotherapy as a subsequent line for previously treated advanced LCNEC exhibited usefulness and tolerability and was identified as a valid treatment option.

Activity and Immune Correlates of Programmed Death-1 Blockade Therapy in Patients With Advanced Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of anti-programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) therapy in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remains unclear. We investigated the outcome of anti-PD-1 therapy and its predictive markers by evaluating the immune-related tumor microenvironment. PATIENTS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced LCNEC treated with systemic chemotherapy. We also evaluated PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (clone: 22C3), CD8-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and the mutational profiles. RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled, and 13 of 70 patients received anti-PD-1 therapy. The progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) of the anti-PD-1 therapy were 4.2 months and 39%, respectively. The overall survival of patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy (n = 13) was significantly better than those treated without anti-PD-1 therapy (n = 57) (25.2 months vs 10.9 months; P = .02). Among the 13 patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy, 10 patients (90%) had PD-L1-negative tumors. Patients with a high density of tumoral CD8-positive TILs (≥38/mm2) had a significantly better ORR and PFS than those with a low density of tumoral CD8-positive TILs (ORR: P = .02; PFS: P = .003). Additionally, all 3 patients with TP53 mutation co-occurring with PIK3CA mutation (2 of 8 patients) or RB1 mutation (1 of 8 patients) responded to anti-PD-1 therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 therapy was effective regardless of PD-L1 positivity in patients with advanced LCNEC. Our investigation might suggest that the density of tumoral CD8-positive TILs and the presence of co-occurring mutations are predictors of the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced LCNEC.

Pulmonary large cell carcinoma, highly positive for PD-L1, shows marked response to pembrolizumab: A case report.

Pulmonary large cell carcinoma (LCC) is classified as a poorly defined entity among non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). At present, there are no effective anticancer drugs, such as molecular targeted drugs, for LCC, and it has been reported that patient prognosis is poor. Recently, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the therapeutic strategies for patients with NSCLC. Here, we present a case of LCC successfully treated with pembrolizumab. A 58-year-old man who was a former smoker was diagnosed with LCC. The postoperative stage was T3N2M0. During postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, swelling of the supraclavicular lymph node was observed and the patient was diagnosed with recurrence. The patient was treated with two regimens of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy; however, he experienced some hoarseness. Imaging confirmed swelling of the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and the patient was subsequently diagnosed with disease progression. Previous surgical specimens when immunostained showed that a high proportion of the tumor cells were positive for expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and it was decided to commence treatment with pembrolizumab. This treatment resulted in rapid regression of the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, and a progression-free period maintained for at least 24 treatment cycles. The patient's hoarseness improved, and the lymph nodes decreased in size. Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 may be an option for patients with PD-L1 positive LCC. This case report suggests that treatment with ICIs may be important in the selection of treatment for not only LCC but also relatively rare NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.

Real-world survival outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors in large-cell neuroendocrine tumors of lung.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with advanced large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (aLCNEC). METHODS: 125 consecutive patients with aLCNEC were identified in the electronic databases of 4 participating cancer centers. The patients were divided into group A (patients who received ICI, n=41) and group B (patients who did not receive ICI, n=84). Overall survival since advanced disease diagnosis (OS DX) and OS since ICI initiation (OS ICI) were captured. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 11.8 months (mo) (IQR 7.5-17.9) and 6.0mo (IQR 3.1-10.9), 66% and 76% of patients died in groups A and B, respectively. Median OS DX was 12.4mo (95% CI 10.7 to 23.4) and 6.0mo (95% CI 4.7 to 9.4) in groups A and B, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.02). For ICI administration, HR for OS DX was 0.59 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.93, p=0.02-unadjusted), and 0.58 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.98, p=0.04-adjusted for age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), presence of liver metastases and chemotherapy administration). In a propensity score matching analysis (n=74; 37 patients in each group matched for age and ECOG PS), median OS DX was 12.5 mo (95% CI 10.6 to 25.2) and 8.4 mo (95% CI 5.4 to 16.9) in matched groups A and B, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.046). OS ICI for patients receiving ICI as monotherapy (n=36) was 11.0 mo (95% CI 6.1 to 19.4). CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of retrospective design and small sample size, the results of this real-world cohort analysis suggest a positive impact of ICI on OS in aLCNEC.

Outcomes of Patients with Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in I-IV Stage.

Background and Objectives: Large cell neuroendocrine cancer is characterised by poor prognosis. The standard of treatment is still not established. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and combined LCNEC. Materials and Methods: All patients had confirmed pathology stage I-IV disease recorded between period 2002-2018. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Uni- and multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox-regression analysis. Results: A total of 132 patients with LCNEC and combined LCNEC were included. Half of them had clinical stage IIIB/C-IV. Patients were treated with radical (n = 67, including surgery alone; resection with neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy, or adjuvant radiotherapy; patients treated with radiochemotherapy alone), palliative (n = 41) or symptomatic (n = 24) intention. Seventeen patients were treated with resection margin R1 or R2. Non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) chemotherapy (platinum-vinorelbine; PN schedule) and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) chemotherapy approaches (platinum/carboplatinum-etoposide; PE/KE schedule) were administered in 20 and in 55 patients, respectively. The median (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) OS and PFS were 17 months (9.0-36.2 months) and 7 months (3.0-15.0 months), respectively. Patients treated with negative resection margin, with lower clinical stage, without lymph node metastasis, and with size of primary tumour ≤4 cm showed significantly better OS and PFS. The main risk factors with an adverse effect on survival were advanced CS and positive resection margin. Conclusions: Patients with LCNEC characterized poor prognosis. Independent prognostic factors influencing PFS were initial clinical stage and resection margin R0 vs. R1-2.